Would it be really bad if I just stole this idea outright to tell you about my morning commute?

No? Good.

Another post of interest for my University of Pennsylvania readers (that's two in two days - pretty cool, huh?). Anyway, not much to add here, other than to say, did anyone know that back in the 50's, the United States minted coins with Ben Franklin's picture on them?

For everyone else's benefit, suffice to say that you can't turn too many corners on Penn's campus without running into a picture and/or statue of Ben Franklin, the University's founder. Obviously, back in the 1950's, this was even moreso the case...

(hat tip: Lileks)

I know there's an entire population of adults out there who still buy comic books, and follow the plots like they're soap operas, but I didn't realize how...well, pedestrian, these plots have become.

For instance, here's what the New York Times Book section had to say about the recent murder of Captain America:

Captain America, a Marvel Entertainment superhero, is fatally shot by a sniper in the 25th issue of his eponymous comic, which arrived in stores yesterday. The assassination ends the sentinel of liberty's fight for right, which began in 1941.

The last episode in Captain America's life comes after the events of "Civil War," a seven-issue mini-series that has affected nearly the entire line of Marvel's library of titles. In "Civil War," the government began requiring superheroes to register their services, and it outlawed vigilantism after supervillains and superheroes fought during a reality show, accidentally killing hundreds of civilians. The public likened the heroes to weapons of mass destruction that must be controlled.

OK, first of all, seriously? Marvel Comics has adopted the basic plot of The Incredibles? Isn't this a job for Captain Copyright? Also, note the references to Reality TV and WMD's, which give it that modern, political feel.

We press on:

The registration act polarized the superhero community. Captain America (whose true identity was Steve Rogers) considered the legislation an erosion of civil liberties; Iron Man, on the other side, believed that training heroes as the military, firefighters or the police are trained would only benefit society. When the factions came to blows and caused more destruction, Captain America chose to fight his battle . . .

With his secret ray gun? By using his Red, White and Blue super-shield like a Chinese Star and cutting his enemies to ribbons? By teaming up with his Super Friends to put the bad guys in a giant net and hurtling them towards the sun? Well, no:

When the factions came to blows and caused more destruction, Captain America chose to fight his battle in court.

But in the current issue of his title, Captain America takes bullets in the shoulder and stomach while on the courthouse steps. The assassin is alleged to be Sharon Carter, an intelligence agent romantically involved with Captain America.
[Emphasis mine]

So this is the state of the modern comic book? The superhero goes to court to defend his civil rights, and dies of a gunshot wound amid protest signs calling him a traitor, a victim of a domestic dispute gone bad?

Doesn't this sound more like the final episode of Super ACLU-Lawyer? I realize I've missed 66 years of back issues, but I can't believe this is how Captain America has always been portrayed...

Well, Kumar, anyway:

PHILADELPHIA - Kal Penn [a.k.a. Kalpen Modi], known for his role as Kumar Patel in the 2004 cult classic "Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle," will be a guest instructor at the University of Pennsylvania during the spring 2008 semester.

Penn, 29, will teach two undergraduate courses, tentatively titled, "Images of Asian Americans in the Media" and "Contemporary American Teen Films," the school announced Monday.

Grace Kao, director of Penn's Asian American Studies Program called Modi "one of the leading Asian American actors of his generation."

I'm sure Mr. Modi is an intelligent man (he's currently pursuing a graduate degree at Stanford University), and I'm sure that he will have quite a bit to teach Penn students who are interested in these topics. None of this changes the fact that he will absorb endless amounts of ridicule from the student body (heck - I can almost see the Penn Band's halftime show now - not to mention the Princeton band's, the Brown band's, the Yale band's...)

Also, I think we've estabilshed that Grace Kao needs to get out to the movies more often...

Oh, by the way:

[Modi] recently finished shooting "Harold & Kumar 2 with [John] Cho

Maybe he'll get really lucky and they'll release it on campus on the first day of classes...

Another one of those MadTV spoofs on Steve Jobs:



Watch it all the way to the end. Trust me...

The major snowstorm we had this weekend, a week after we set the clocks ahead for Daylight Savings Time, made one of my colleagues realize that we're no longer "Springing Ahead," since the clocks now go forward in the middle of March, which is the last two weeks of winter, rather than the first week of spring. So, for those who have been waiting and wondering about a solution to this horribly unacceptable connundrum, I am pleased to announce the offical new Daylight Savings Time cliché:

	Old Cliché:	Spring Ahead, Fall Behind
	New Cliché:	March Ahead, Fall Behind

That is all...

One of my rationales for buying a new PC was to give my son, Avery, our old PC. Well, thanks to some good, 24/7 tech support at Linksys, I finally got wireless connectivity in his room this weekend, and I'm pleased to report that the investment showed returns in the first 24 hours.

Avery's school puts on a "Variety Show" each year, which consists of each class doing a dance routine to a recording of a (semi-)popular song. This year, Avery's class is doing Dancing on the Ceiling, by Lionel Ritchie.

So after putting the Internet in his room on Saturday night, I'm sitting in my home office on Sunday morning, and suddenly the printer starts printing the lyrics to Dancing on the Ceiling. It seems my 6-year old typed "Dancing on the Ceiling lyrics" into the Google toolbar on his web browser, clicked on the first link, recognized the words, and clicked "Print."

The Internet was born three days before I was, although I didn't start using it until college. Today, my aptitude with it and related technologies not only enable me to make a living, but enhance the quality of my life in numerous ways.

Google was formed eight months before my son was born, and he's learning to use it in the first grade. I can hardly imagine the benefits his aptitude with it and the related technologies to come will bring him as he grows up.

I am pretty sure, though, that they will be worth more than the price of a new PC in 2007.

It's been a while, so what the heck...

First up, Global Warming:

Global warming is the hottest story of our time, and it will get even bigger . . . [said] a panel of journalists said last weekend during the American Bar Association's environmental law conference. The discussion was focused on how the media has covered the story and whether or not public perception of global warming has changed in recent months and years.

"The public debate is lagging way behind scientific consensus, which is as strong as the consensus on the link between smoking and cancer," said author Eugene Linden. According to Linden and [ABC News correspondent Bill Blakemore], the global warming issue has been the subject of a massive, industry-sponsored disinformation and propaganda campaign aimed at creating the perception that there is still a scientific debate on the basic facts of global warming.

No argument here. But this is the guy that interests me. I think he has it exactly right:

Colorado Springs Gazette editorial page editor Sean Paige, took a contrarian view. Paige, the only panelist who wasn't prepared to jump wholeheartedly on the global warming bandwagon, said a decade of sensationalistic coverage of environmental issues has resulted in a cry-wolf syndrome. "Maybe the wolf is at the door now," Paige said, referring to global warming. "But the public has tuned out. We (journalists) haven't been skeptical enough of the environmental anxiety industry," he said.

Paige, describing himself as a layered skeptic, said there's still room for a global warming debate. "What can be done and what will it cost?" Paige asked. Journalists should be asking whether it's really wise at this point to pour massive resources into prevention when the money might be better spent on adaptive measures. Paige said it's not clear that capping greenhouse gas emissions, for example, will make a meaningful difference in curbing the warming trend.

Paige also said he sees a form of eco-McCarthyism on the rise, with the fixation on "consensus" leading to a muzzling of dissenting voices. "Let's silence everybody who doesn't agree," Paige said, characterizing the mood as he perceives it and claiming that there are legitimate scientists out there who have valid questions about the state of global warming science. But those voices are not being heard. . .

"Prevention vs. Adaptive Measures." That's the phrase I've been looking for for over a year now.

Having just gone through DSTY2K7 testing at work, I've been reminiscing about the whole Y2K story. Remember what people were saying about Y2K? The power grid was going to fail, the financial markets were going to fail to open, heating & water systems were going to shut down, nuclear missiles would malfunction in their silos, and basically our entire society would be plunged into chaos? Here's the thing: if no one did anything to fix the Y2K bugs, many of these things, crazy as they seem, probably would have happened. But people didn't do nothing. They waited until it was an emergency (remember - everyone knew about the Y2K problem as far back as the late '70s), and then they took steps to avoid those catastrophic results. The whole thing cost billions of dollars, but it got done.

I think the paradigm around global warming is very similar. I'm willing to believe that if nothing is done, highly populated areas will wind up underwater, hunger and disease will spread rapidly, and many people will suffer and die. I'm just not willing to believe that people will do nothing. Even the most dire of predictions talks about how bad life will be in 2050 or 2080. If Y2K is our guide, I think we'll see a massive campaign to deal with the impact of this problem when the water starts lapping at our shores. And by then, it won't be about reducing greenhouse gas emissions. It will be about building levees that work, reinforcing shorelines, finding new ways to prevent beach erosion, etc.

Next, the War in Iraq:

Apparently, U.S. military deaths in Iraq have declined by about 20% since the "surge" began. Regardless of whether you're pro-surge, anti-surge, pro-Bush, or anti-Bush, I assume we can all agree that this is good news, no? Check out what the New York Times wrote:

The heightened American street presence may already have contributed to an increase in the percentage of American deaths that occur in Baghdad.

Over all, the number of American soldiers killed in Iraq from hostilities since Feb. 14, the start of the new Baghdad security plan, fell to 66, from 87 in the previous four weeks. But with more soldiers in the capital on patrol and in the neighborhood garrisons, a higher proportion of the American deaths have occurred in Baghdad - 36 percent after Feb. 14 compared with 24 percent in the previous four weeks. Also over the past four weeks, a higher proportion of military deaths from roadside bombs have occurred in Baghdad - 45 percent compared with 39 percent.

So let me get this straight: we put more troops in Baghdad, and the percentage of the troops killed or injured in Baghdad went up. That just seems like basic math, no? Why is the Times pointing to it as a mitigating factor against the drop in overall casualties? If only one soldier is killed in the next four weeks, and he/she happens to be in Baghdad, will the Times report a near tripling of the Baghdad U.S. Death Percentage (from 36% to 100%)?

I know there are people who rip on the Times all the time for being a liberal rag. I try to stay away from that because I think one can find their opponent's political spin in just about any article if they look hard enough for it. But in this case, it feels very much like the Times is just reaching for bad news, lest it need to report something positive about the much-maligned (in its own pages) "Surge" strategy.

Finally, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's stunning confession of his involvement in the 9/11 plot:

WASHINGTON - Khalid Sheikh Mohammed portrayed himself as Al Qaeda's most ambitious operational planner in a confession to a U.S. military tribunal that said he planned and supported 31 terrorist attacks, topped by Sept. 11, that killed thousands of innocent victims since the early 1990s.

Many plots, including a previously undisclosed plan to kill several former U.S. presidents, were never carried out or were foiled by international counter-terror authorities.

I honestly don't understand how this suddenly appeared as "big news" yesterday in every major paper in the country. Here's what the 9/11 Commission Report had to say about Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (a.k.a., "KSM"):

No one exemplifies the model of the terrorist entrepreneur more clearly than Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the principal architect of the 9/11 attacks.

In 1994, KSM accompanied [Ramzi Yousef, architect of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing] to the Philippines, and the two of them began planning what is now known as the Manila air or "Bojinka" plot - the intended bombing of 12 U.S. commercial jumbo jets over the Pacific during a two-day span. During this same period, KSM and Yousef also developed plans to assassinate President Clinton during his November 1994 trip to Manila, and to bomb U.S.-bound cargo carriers by smuggling jackets containing nitrocellulose on board.

[In mid-1996,] KSM arranged a meeting with Bin Ladin in Tora Bora, a mountainous redoubt from the Afghan war days. At the meeting, KSM presented the al Qaeda leader with a menu of ideas for terrorist operations [including] a proposal for an operation that would involve training pilots who would crash planes into buildings in the United States. This proposal eventually would become the 9/11 operation.

Bin Ladin . . . finally decided to give KSM the green light for the 9/11 operation sometime in late 1998 or early 1999. KSM then accepted Bin Ladin's standing invitation to move to Kandahar and work directly with al Qaeda. In addition to supervising the planning and preparations for the 9/11 operation, KSM worked with and eventually led al Qaeda's media committee.

While the 9/11 project occupied the bulk of KSM's attention, he continued to consider other possibilities for terrorist attacks. For example, he sent al Qaeda operative Issa al Britani to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to learn about the jihad in Southeast Asia from Hambali. Thereafter, KSM claims, at Bin Ladin's direction in early 2001, he sent Britani to the United States to case potential economic and "Jewish" targets in New York City. Furthermore, during the summer of 2001, KSM approached Bin Ladin with the idea of recruiting a Saudi Arabian air force pilot to commandeer a Saudi fighter jet and attack the Israeli city of Eilat. Bin Ladin reportedly liked this proposal, but he instructed KSM to concentrate on the 9/11 operation first. Similarly, KSM's proposals to Atef around this same time for attacks in Thailand, Singapore, Indonesia, and the Maldives were never executed, although Hambali's Jemaah Islamiah operatives did some casing of possible targets.

(pages 145-150)

Nice guy, huh? The Commission report explains at the beginning of the chapter that much of this information comes from the confessions of KSM himself, and while the authors weren't present at the interrogation, they did their best to reconcile information with other documents, interview sources, etc. In cases where they could not corroborate KSM's stories, they said, they indicated as much in the text of the report ("KSM claims...")

So what's the new news here? The 9/11 Commission Report was published back in 2004. Is this just the administration seeking a pat on the back? If so, why now? There's no election coming up, and none of them are running again anyway. Or maybe someone in the media mistook the release of the transcripts as an indication that their contents were previously unknown, and then everyone else followed suit? It all strikes me as very, very strange...

Anyway, I think that scratched my political itch for now. Back to more interesting topics in the coming days...

OK, this one's for my friends in Utah. A guy in New York City has created a pizza that he sells for $1,000:

Nino Selimaj, who runs six pizza restaurants in New York, on Wednesday unveiled his Luxury Pizza, a 12 inch (30 cms), thin crust topped with caviar, lobster, creme fraiche and chives. Cut into eight, it works out at $125 a slice.

Mr. Selimaj says it's no publicity stunt - he did over a year of market research to determine demand, and has already sold one pizza. But here's the money quote:

"But where better to experiment with pizza than in New York where people love their pizza," he said.

Indeed...

As I've mentioned before, I've been a Windows Vista user for about a month now.

When I find some time, I'll post a detailed review. This, however, warranted special mention. From Hewlett Packard's Products site on my HP Scanjet 5400c:

We are sorry to inform you that there will be no Windows Vista support available for your HP product. Therefore your product will not work with Windows Vista.

The majority of HP products not supported in Windows Vista are beyond seven years old. If you are using the Windows Vista operating system on your computer, please consider upgrading to a newer HP product that is supported on Windows Vista.

HP has numerous products on the market that support Windows Vista:
http://www.hp.com/united-states/tradein/home_flash.html

I don't know exactly when I bought my scanner, but my old PC is four years old, and the scanner came after the PC, so it's significantly younger than "the majority." Also, I clicked on the Trade-In link, only to see this:

The product you have entered does not have an aftermarket trade value. You may want to consider one of the disposal options below.

My options at this point seem to be: a) put the scanner in my son's room (with the old PC) and go up to his bedroom whenever I need to scan, or b) buy a new scanner.

Plan A would be a no-brainer, except that I hate to take up desk space in my son's room for something he'll hardly ever use. I'll probably swing by Best Buy or some such store this weekend and see if I can find a really cheap (read: <$100) scanner for the office. If not, we'll go with Plan A.

In any case, isn't it interesting that HP took such subtle advantage of the opportunity Windows Vista presented it, by basically declaring the back-end of their product pipeline dead on arrival? Writing Vista drivers for these devices could not be that expensive. By not bothering, they simply decided to screw over their old customers and force them to spend some money to replace something that's working just fine as it is.

So that's how it's going to be, HP? OK, noted...

Check out the weather forecast for New York City over the next couple of days:

62 degrees and rain today, low 30's and 4-6 inches of snow tomorrow. I hope the tourists packed their entire wardrobe!

Also, I'm sure this indicates something profound about global warming, global cooling, or global climate change. Exactly what that is, though, I have no idea...

I'm beginning to believe that as Apple enters the mainstream, it will slowly but surely turn into Microsoft.

Case in point: the EU is accusing them of anti-competitive practices because of how they bundle their software

Pressure on Apple has been building, with consumer rights organizations from Germany, France, Finland and Norway recently agreeing a joint position in their battles against iTunes.

They argue that Apple uses digital rights technology to limit consumers' free use of songs bought on iTunes, including the ability to copy and transfer songs to other users and other MP3 devices besides the Apple iPod.

It's not that bad right now - these are just consumer groups, not the DOJ-equivalent government agencies that went after Microsoft for putting Windows Media Player into Windows. The head of that agency, though, had this to say:

Do you think it's fine that a CD plays in all CD players but that an iTunes song only plays in an iPod? I don't. Something has to change

A spokeswoman said these were her personal views, not those of the Commission. Still, ITMS and the iPod have certainly been noticed over in the EU...

One of my more popular Ramblings (long-form) articles is DSL - The Darkside of Broadband, in which I describe the odyssey that was installing a Verizon DSL modem at my parents' house. So when my in-laws purchased a Verizon DSL modem (the Westell Model 327W, for those who are interested), I braced myself for another series of weekend trips, calls to Verizon tech support, and unforeseen expenses.

I'm happy to report that this time, the entire process took less than two hours. But that's only because I had anticipated all the problems my parents had, and made sure my in-laws did enough prep work up front to avoid delays.

So, as a public service, I present Tips & Tricks on The Right Way to Install a DSL Modem:

1) Check the O/S
Windows XP (and, I assume, Windows Vista?) supports USB 2.0 natively, but earlier versions of Windows do not. If the machine you're installing on has an O/S that pre-dates Windows XP, you're going to have to connect the DSL modem with an Ethernet cable, not a USB cable.

2) Check that the Machine has an Ethernet Connection
Today, every machine has an Ethernet connection, but not everyone who is switching to DSL (presumably from dial-up) has a new PC. In a lot of cases, it's someone with an older machine (bought when dial-up was the slickest way onto the Internet), who would have had to shell out $100 or more for a NIC card back when the machine was purchased. If the machine has no Ethernet, you can pick one up at any Radio Shack, Best Buy, CompUSA, etc. In this case, I bought a Linksys 10/100 EtherFast PCI Adapter (LNE-100TX) for about $35 and brought it with me to the install.

3) Make Sure You Have Enough Filters
Before I even showed up at my in-laws house, I made them count the number of phone jacks that used the DSL-enabled line and compare with the number of filters they were sent. As with my parents, there weren't enough. My in-laws had Verizon deliver the additional filters (including one for a wall-mounted phone, which doesn't come in the standard box) before I even set foot in the door.

4) Make Sure the Machine Has a CD Drive
The installation software comes on CD, and as discussed above, you're not necessarily dealing with a modern PC here. I honestly don't know what I'd do if the PC had no CD Drive (would buying an external one be worth it to install DSL? Your mileage may vary...)

5) Manage Expectations Around AOL and Other Software
AOL now offers their service for free if you have broadband service from someone else (e.g., Verizon DSL). This was a lifesaver, since unlike my parents situation, I was able to leave the software side of things pretty much alone when I was done (they still use AOL for mail & web browsing, but everything's a lot faster now). I did show them Internet Explorer, since it's a lot faster than AOL at web browsing, even with a DSL connection. I also told them to assume that AOL would bill them for the current month in full, and then switch them to the free service. Who knows - AOL may pro-rate the last month, but just in case, I managed expectations downward...

If all of the above check out, you should be in for a pretty quick install:

-- Go around the house and install all the filters
-- Grab a small Phillips head screwdriver and proceed into the computer room...
-- Open the PC in question and install the Ethernet card (if necessary)
-- Put the Installation CD in the drive and follow all instructions, including how to hook up the Ethernet cable and the phone line to the DSL modem
-- Log into AOL, change the service provider to ISP/LAN from dial-up (if necessary), go to keyword: Billing, select "Price Plan," and then click "Switch to Free"
-- Delete all the distracting new icons on the desktop and train the PC's users in how the PC now gets on the Internet (AOL, IE, Outlook Express, etc.). Season to taste...
-- Voila! You're good to go...

 

Hat tip to Jason Bennion:

Swiss accidentally invade Liechtenstein

According to Swiss daily Blick, the 170 [Swiss] infantry soldiers wandered just over a mile across an unmarked border into the tiny principality [of Liechtenstein] early Thursday before realizing their mistake and turning back.

A spokesman for the Swiss army confirmed the story but said that there were unlikely to be any serious repercussions for the mistaken invasion.

Best. Headline. Ever.

They typically load passengers on the plane starting at the back, so people aren't stepping over each other in the aisle. Logical.

They also pre-board their frequent flyers to provide an incentive for becoming one of their regular customers. Makes perfect sense.

So how come, when the flight's a commuter flight (i.e., Chicago to Newark at 6:30pm), and more than half the passengers are frequent flyers, do they just randomly board all the frequent flyers first, as opposed to boarding the frequent flyers from the back of the plane forward? Wouldn't it be better for everyone, including the frequent flyers, if they didn't have to step over each other once onboard?

I'm just askin' is all...

Remember when we were kids and they told us that one day, advertising would be everywhere? Well, they were right.

With all the technology running through the house lately, I never got a chance to post about my other new toy: An HP Pavillion dv6000 laptop.

Here was my thinking: Now that we're a multi-PC househould (the super-fast desktop PC in the home office and the previous office PC in my son's room), we might as well setup an actual wireless network in the house. And what's a wireless network without being able to access the network from anywhere in the house? Ergo, we need a laptop.

This was unfamiliar territory for me, because it meant buying a PC that wasn't tricked out to do anything I may ever imagine doing with a PC. After all, I already have the desktop PC for that. Instead, this machine would serve more of an "appliance" function. It'd be the machine we keep in a drawer in the den, so we can surf the web or check our e-mail while watching TV, or the machine that my wife would use when she's doing some work from home while taking care of the kids. So it had to be cheap and competent, as opposed to expensive and awesome.

Stop #1 was Dell.com. Every computer I've ever bought for myself has been purchased through Dell.com. I know some people have had troubles with them, especially lately, but my experiences have all been good (knock on silicon...). It turns out, though, that Dell doesn't do "cheap and competent" all that well. The cheapest laptop I could configure from Dell with my minimum requirements came to more than $1,500 every time. Very odd. So, I found myself doing something I haven't done since my parents took me shopping in grade school - going to a computer store to buy a computer.

My first instinct was Best Buy. Large store, big selection, and if you're lucky, some competent sales people who can answer basic questions about the products. I can't say I was disappointed in this regard. I learned a lot of about laptops and about Windows Vista there, and actually decided on a laptop: a Gateway, 17-inch machine for just $700. Quite a steal. So good, in fact, that they were sold out of it and couldn't predict when they'd get more. I left the store empty handed.

My next stop was CompUSA. By this time, I knew exactly what I wanted: a 15-inch screen, Windows Vista Home Premium, at least a Pentium Duo chip, 1GB of RAM, a graphics card with at least 200MB of dedicated RAM, a decent (but not huge) hard drive, and whatever other bells & whistles they could throw in. CompUSA had the HP Pavillion dv6000 for $700, plus $150 for accidental damage & warranty for two years (for most devices, I ignore these packages, but a laptop has a higher chance of being dropped, spilled on, etc., especially with kids in the house). So, I came away with a new laptop for $850, all-in. A little more than I hoped for at the outset, but still a pretty good deal for a brand new PC.

I'll post later about my thoughts on Windows Vista, my experience with wirelessly networking the two machines together, as well as my thoughts on file sharing (Vista on the receiving end and Windows XP as the host - not exactly a common configuration these days). But I'll close this post with a quick word for my Mac-friendly friends on the topic of "it just works."

When I opened my laptop, the first thing I saw was a piece of paper that said (I'm paraphrasing here):

Congratulations on purchasing your new HP laptop. The first time you turn it on, your laptop will optimize Windows Vista for you, based on your answers to a few simple questions. During this process, the laptop screen may go dark for short periods of time, and the computer may appear unresponsive. Do not turn the machine off during this time. The process will take approximately 25 minutes.

I plugged it in and turned it on. It asked me for basic ID info (name, address, phone number) for the purposes of registering with HP, and it asked me for my timezone, preferred language, etc. to setup Vista properly. Then, it went to work. Most of the time, the screen had "feel good about the machine you just bought" advertisements on it. Occasionally, it did go dark as the paper said - including a couple of automatic Vista reboots. In the end, though, exactly 25 minutes later, I was up and running with my new laptop. It really could not have been simpler.

So, there you have it. My new PC is still in boxes in my living room, but I'm already a full-fledged Vista user, and a bit of an expert on wireless networking and file-sharing. Turns out the laptop served the unintended purpose of training me to be my own IT Support desk, before attempting the big job that awaits tomorrow.

Should be fun...

Mmmmmmm.......Computer........

Now you know what I'll be doing this weekend!